User:WhaleLord11/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Ace Magic

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose to do this article because it was part of the "C-Class Air sports articles" and the name of the article intrigued me.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

When reading the Lead section, it concisely and clearly describes what the article topic is. The Lead section does not contain a brief description on the major sections. But it makes sense because this is a very short read.

The information that is given to us does relate to the contents of the article. The is up to date, 13 April 2023 was the article' s last update.

When reading the article I can tell that the article was written to be informative and non-bias.

When looking at the references used, I noticed that they only used two different sources. Just by looking at the date of the references they date back to the early 2010's. Making them not so recent. This makes sense because the topic of the article needs a more in-depth search. When searching for this topic on the surface level, it will mainly give you things that are not related to the contents of the article. By clicking the links in the references, both of them takes us to the same page. Thus we can infer that the source isn't diverse and potently has little variation in their information.

The article for it's size is well written. It reads very easily because it is short and concise. It also flows very well, from topic to topic without seeming out of place.

The article includes no image of the Ace Magic aircraft.

There are no ongoing conversations happening for this article. The talk page in empty. Though this article is within the scope of the " Aviation WikiProject".

From what I can see, I think that current status of this article is completed. The article main strengths are it's greatest weakest and that it is that fact it is very short read and a very niche (some-what underground) topic. Thus a lot of the information in this article can be overlooked and stated as fact. Think one improvement to this article would be to add an image of the Ace Magic aircraft. That way in the future for anyone else looking at this article in the future they have a visual representation for what they are reading about. It is very hard for me to gauge the completeness of this article because I am not very well versed in air sports and this topic is very niche.