User:Whatischemistry/Foreign body reaction/Fernaldy0917 Peer Review


 * Whose work are you reviewing?

WhatisChemistry


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User
 * Foreign body reaction


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

General info

 * Hello Daniel, in this peer review I just want to say thaat you have made a good amountt of progress. However, I do think thaat you need to add more to your article. The lead in your article need more body and I think it is still too simple. You could quickly discuss types of body reaction too. I also think that you need to add more to your content so that each sub-heading is explain carefully. You could also use tables in your article to make your article more eye-appealing. I really like how you organize your article and all the sources work. Instead of having the same sources in one sub-heading, may be research more. Good job!
 * Lead
 * Yes, lead has been updated and reflect good content
 * The first sentence need a little bit of tweek. You could delete "following" and start by explaining what is biomaterial implantation
 * Yes it does give detail about the article
 * great job making the lead
 * Content
 * All content is relevant to the topic
 * the content is up to date
 * Good job explaining each in detail
 * Tone and Balang
 * The content seems neutral
 * I don't see any bias information
 * Sources
 * the sources are all reliable and all the links worked
 * the sources are also up to date
 * However, I still suggest to have more than one sources in each sub-sections. Although each source is reliable, different sources could make good updates
 * Organization
 * The content is very clear and easy to read
 * i don't see any grammar and spelling error
 * The content is also well organized
 * Images
 * The article does have images that make it more appealing
 * images are also well captioned
 * images are not copyright
 * Maybe put the images not in gallery and spread out to the whole article
 * Overall impressions
 * Great job expaning this topic! I really like how you organize your content.

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)