User:Wheel112/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Shape-memory alloy

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it was interesting to me. It is a

Evaluate the article
The lead section concisely explains what a Shape-memory alloy is and how it can be used. It does not describe the article's main sections, but doesn't include information that is not otherwise present in the article. All of the article's content remains relevant to the topic and is up-to-date, with the latest edit occurring in late October. There is no obvious missing or excess content, and does not address any equity gaps. The article is very professional and neutral. The citations are working and abundant. There is a missing citation in the lead, but all cited sources are thorough and current. They appear to be written by a diverse spectrum of authors. The article is very organized and reads well. There are no apparent grammatical errors. The article includes useful images; Some of which captioned, while others are not properly scaled. The talk page has many conversations about the accuracy and content of the article. The article does not seem to be part of a Wikiproject. I would say this article's overall status is decent. It explains the technology and applications thoroughly, but could use some improvements to it's images and lead section.