User:Wheeler7/Reuteran/Malaypayne Peer Review

General info
Wheeler7
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Wheeler7/Reuteran
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
I like the amount of articles/references you have for your information! What you have is good so far, I would definitely just recommend you add more information and subheadings going into the different aspects of reuteran. Looking over the guidelines it gives us while doing the peer review I noticed it could give you some specific and good ideas on what to add. For example, a section called "Lead" (your introduction basically", relevant subheadings after that like you have with "synthesis" and I'd recommend you go into its uses/significance and try to help us understand why it is important/why we should care honestly. Just keep similar topics together and if you are changing subjects then start a new subheading.

To summarize: Keep it up with the articles/references. Make/title a specific "Lead" paragraph that summarizes all the main points the following subheadings are going to go into. Identify a few subheadings you could create explaining beyond just the synthesis and structure of it, but why it is relevant/important, etc. You could even refer to the peer review guidelines they give for ideas on what specifics to include/how to format and present the info.