User:Where/Kylu-blahblah

Kylu
[ Discuss here]  '''Ending 00:56, SEVEN DAYS AFTER TODAY'S DATE AND TIME, MAKE SURE THIS IS THE ENDING DATE! (UTC)'''

– I think Kylu is overdue for adminship. She has gained an admirable amount of knowledge on Wikipedia policy by her involvement in vandalism reversion, mediation in the mediation cabal, AFD voting, help in removing personal information, correction of spelling, welcoming of users, stub sorting, article writing, and more. Most importantly, she is a kind and approachable user (she is even part of the kindness campaign). Her edit count as of writing is 3499, which should satisfy people with even the severest cases of editcountitis. If Kylu becomes an administrator, I think she would be a great asset to Wikipedia. Kylu has plenty of misgivings about having an RFA. However, I think she is ready; after all, she is the very model of a modern Wikipedian. -- Where 00:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:


 * Support
 * 1) (Placeholder. Noms feel free to push me down in the stack, not trying to get "first", just toward the top... but this will be replaced with a re-signed support once/if this goes live.) Where has it spot on... if you look at the stuff Kylu does it's all good. Welcoming new users, great fixerupper edits, participation in key WP areas, such as RfA where she often asks very astute questions, generally helpful and calm demeanor, and she has shown sound judgement in her activities in the Mediation Cabal (she's currently helping out as co-coordinator there to make things run smoothly). I subscribe to the Cincinnatus model, and think reluctant candidates often make the best admins. Despite her own misgivings I think she'll be an awesome admin. Hearty "More candidates like this one, please!TM" Support  + +Lar: t/c 13:00, 3 July 2006 (UTC) (will be replaced with new timestamp after acceptance to show I still mean it)


 * Oppose


 * Neutral


 * Comments

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * Questions for the candidate
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A:


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A:


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: