User:Whispersarai/Attention seeking/Ecruz6 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Whispersarai


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Attention seeking


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead of this article provides a clear understanding of what the article will talk about. The first two leads are clear and concise but I find the last two somewhat confusing. They don't seem to fit well and may need more detail so that the readers know what they're looking at.

Content/Sources

The content of this article covers different potential causes for attention-seeking. As I was reading the article, I had a clear understanding of the attention-seeking behavior entitled of. Multiple sources were linked to this article which was helpful because It was helpful knowing of other similar behaviors related to attention-seeking. I also liked the fact that there is a section that talked about a technique that people could use to ignore this type of behavior. It would be a great idea to possibly add more to this list. The section that I found somewhat confusing was the 'in different pathologies or context' because I wasn't too sure what I was looking at. It would be helpful to rewrite or reorganize that section to make it more pleasing to read.

Tone & Balance

I would have to say that the article's tone was neutral. I didn't stop to think once that the author was being biased nor that they were trying to persuade me in some sort of way. The balance of sources was evenly throughout the article as well.

Organization

The way this article is organized flows decently. The information was clear and concise but I think that this article needs some small details to be changed. For example, the contents section could be on the left or right-hand side of the page and not in the middle of the article. Some paragraphs could be combined and reworded so they make sense. Overall, I think the most important information was straightforward.

Images & Media

There are no images in this article which makes it not so interesting to read compared to an article that does have images. It would be nice to add some images regarding the planned ignoring section.