User:Whiteguru/Bad Girl

Talk:Bad Girl (Confessions of a Shopaholic song)/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

'''Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessment will follow the same sections of the Article. ''' --Whiteguru (talk) 01:55, 4 July 2021 (UTC) Instructions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment



Observations
HTML document size: 102 kB   Prose size (including all HTML code): 6633 B    References (including all HTML code): 11 kB    Wiki text: 8562 B    Prose size (text only): 3964 B (690 words) "readable prose size" References (text only): 2822 B


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Page has two infoboxes due two productions of this song (released) and (leaked) for this film. Infoboxes accepted.
 * The lead provides a reasonable introduction.


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Reference 1 is an archived purchase link on Amazon. (not admissible)
 * Reference 2 is a play sample (Primary, not a proper reference)
 * Reference 3 is about the leaked version of this song. (OK)
 * Reference 4 is about the two versions of this song soundtrack and leaked version. (OK)
 * Reference 5 is a review of all songs on the film - this song gets a mention. Is all. (mention, only)
 * Reference 6 is a dead link. (About Rhianna chart history.)
 * Earwig copyvio check gives a 74% copyvio from this source.


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The references do not give a sufficiently broad coverage of this song track.


 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Opinions about two different recordings of this song by different groups are presented.
 * There is criticism going each way in the references.


 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Page created 8 March 2012
 * Page has 103 edits by 49 editors
 * 90 day page views = 706 with a daily average of 8 page views
 * Page obtained GA status 12 May 2012
 * InternetArchiveBot has rescued two dead links;
 * Page has been subject to a number of move discussions due participation by different artists.
 * Page history shows stability, no edit warring observed


 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Page has one image appropriately labelled and licensed.
 * File:Pussycat Dolls w trasie koncertowej z Britney Spears.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license.


 * 1) Notifying Editors:
 * Page Creator Calvin999 notified;
 * Editor Ser Amantio di Nicolao notified;
 * Editor Status notified
 * Editor Razr Nation notified
 * Editor Wikipedian Penguin notified (semi retired)
 * Editor Aoba47
 * A total of six involved editors were able to be notified.


 * 1) Overall:
 * There is a serious copy violation here which forms a major part of this article.
 * References do not provide a broad coverage.
 * Discussion is opened to involved editors. Considered not to merit GA status at this review.

for one week