User:Whiteguru/Eidsvoll Verk Station

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

'''Starts GA Reassessment. ''' --Whiteguru (talk) 21:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC) Talk:Eidsvoll Verk Station/GA2 Resonator Instructions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment



Observations
Document statistics
 * HTML document size: 58 kB
 * Prose size (including all HTML code): 3872 B
 * References (including all HTML code): 8225 B
 * Wiki text: 5946 B
 * Prose size (text only): 2055 B (355 words) "readable prose size"
 * References (text only): 399 B
 * Page created 1 April 2007
 * Total Number of Edits: 35 by 19 editors
 * 90 day page views = 85, daily average of 1 view
 * 7 bot visits on page, no visits by ClueBot NG, suggesting no overt vandalism
 * Majority of edits on this page occurred during 2015;
 * Resonator confirms wikdata entry; article exists on en / da / fr / nl wikis
 * IABot run over page; results
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150122223947/https://www.nsb.no/en/bestill/velg-togavgang?passengerType1=1&to=100000&bookingPassengerExtrasPetfree=0&portable=false&bookingPassengerExtrasStroller=0&passengerCard1=&bookingPassengerExtrasClosetodog=0&hour=8&from=222000&date=22.01.2015&type=single&returnDate=22.01.2015&passengers=1&bookingPassengerExtrasAnimalsallowed=0&returnHour=3&booking-submit-form=View%20train%20times%20and%20fares&redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nsb.no%2Fen%2Fbestill%2Fvelg-togavgang to https://www.nsb.no/en/bestill/velg-togavgang?passengerType1=1&to=100000&bookingPassengerExtrasPetfree=0&portable=false&bookingPassengerExtrasStroller=0&passengerCard1=&bookingPassengerExtrasClosetodog=0&hour=8&from=222000&date=22.01.2015&type=single&returnDate=22.01.2015&passengers=1&bookingPassengerExtrasAnimalsallowed=0&returnHour=3&booking-submit-form=View%20train%20times%20and%20fares&redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nsb.no%2Fen%2Fbestill%2Fvelg-togavgang
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150122223956/https://reiseplanlegger.ruter.no/en/Mellom/Fra/%282370431%29Eidsvoll%20verk%20stasjon%20%5Bbuss%5D%20%28Eidsvoll%29/til/%282370601%29Dal%20stasjon%20%5Bbuss%5D%20%28Eidsvoll%29/etter/220120150700 to https://reiseplanlegger.ruter.no/en/Mellom/Fra/%282370431%29Eidsvoll%20verk%20stasjon%20%5Bbuss%5D%20%28Eidsvoll%29/til/%282370601%29Dal%20stasjon%20%5Bbuss%5D%20%28Eidsvoll%29/etter/220120150700
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150122224927/https://www.nsb.no/en/our-destinations/stations/eidsvoll-verk?id=0222 to https://www.nsb.no/en/our-destinations/stations/eidsvoll-verk?id=0222
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110815161650/http://www.jernbaneverket.no/no/Jernbanen/Stasjonssok/-E-/Eidsvoll-Verk/ to http://www.jernbaneverket.no/no/Jernbanen/Stasjonssok/-E-/Eidsvoll-Verk/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20220525004925/https://forsk.njk.no/stdb/index.php?Stnr=1904&aut=&mod=st&sid=782 to http://forsk.njk.no/stdb/index.php?Stnr=1904&aut=&mod=st&sid=782

Images
 * File:Eidsvoll Verk stasjon.jpg = Own work, Author: Mahlum, released into the public domain by author
 * File:Eidsvoll Verk stasjon Norway.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 licence
 * Images have appropriate use with suitable captions; images are tagged and have licensing or fair use rationales

References
 * Sources cited in the article checked; all references archived.

Short Article and GA Status
 * A short article is regarded as less than 25kb. This article is 58kb (see above)
 * Good Article Talk Archives advise, A good article may be of any length, as long as it properly addresses all major aspects of the topic.

Good Article Criteria

 * 1) The article should be clearly written, in good prose, with correct spelling and grammar.
 * 2) The article should be factually accurate according to reliable sources
 * 3) The article should broadly cover the topic without unnecessary digressions.
 * 4) The article should be stable, with no ongoing edit wars.
 * 5) The article should comply with image use policy.
 * 6) The article is free of obvious copyright violations.


 * There being no failures of the Six Good Article Criteria the current status of this article is confirmed. --Whiteguru (talk) 01:16, 25 May 2022 (UTC)