User:Whiteguru/The Itchy & Scratchy & Poochie Show

Talk:The Itchy & Scratchy & Poochie Show/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

'''Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessment will follow the same sections of the Article. ''' --Whiteguru (talk) 21:22, 10 July 2021 (UTC) Instructions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment



Observations

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Prose is good, follows MOS


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Citations are accurate and well presented.
 * Some link rot has been observed.
 * Running the Internet Archive Bot over this page may sort that issue.


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Article touches a lot of bases, the coverage is sufficiently broad for this specific genre.


 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * This particular episode flags falling ratings and in-show strategies to revive the series. As such, the coverage is remarkably neutral.
 * NPOV is presented in this article


 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Page created 11 July 2005
 * Page has 599 edits by 307 editors and has 34 page watchers
 * 90 day page views = 6,144 with an average of 68 views daily.
 * Internet Archive Bot has visited twice; Cluebot NG once.
 * Listed as Good Article: March 14, 2007


 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * No images; comprehensive infobox used;


 * 1) Overall:
 * Article meets all six criteria for GA status.