User:Whiteknox/note on bju kjv

The King-James-Only movement&mdash;or more correctly, movements, since it has many variations&mdash;became a divisive force in fundamentalism only as conservative modern Bible translations, such as the New American Standard Bible (NASB) and the New International Version (NIV) began to appear in the 1970s.

This does not seem well-connected to the context. The article passes from explaining that BJU isn't KJV to firing a salvo at KJV-only movement (not that they don't deserve to be fired at). Perhaps the following would be more coherent:
 * The KJV-only controversy has only become an issue since the 1970s and