User:Whitneyatwelle/Post-traumatic stress disorder and substance use disorders/Morrisse95 Peer Review

General info
Morrisse95 reviewing Whitneyatwelle
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Whitneyatwelle/Post-traumatic stress disorder and substance use disorders
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Post-traumatic stress disorder and substance use disorders

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: There is no lead into the article, which could be added to help a reader know where to go within the article. The lead could use a direction of where to go.

Content:

The content that you wrote is very well written, It is relevant to the topic of the article and adds to the underrepresented population which is wonderful.

Tone and balance:

The tone of the article is neutral and to the fact of the article. It informs the reader of what is underrepresented with out adding a persuasive or argumentative tone.

Organization:

The article is concise on organization and easy to read no grammatical mistakes that I recognized. The article is very easy to read.

References:

The references you have added are not the most recent, there is probably more up to date information that could be referenced such as the references going back to 2010 & 1997.

Images:

If there is more images you can add then wonderful, otherwise, the images on the article already are great.

The articles new information has a wonderful reference section that has met Wikipedia's notability requirements.

Over all, the information that you have added is very informative and provides knowledge that the original article did not have.