User:WhoAteMyButter/XfD log

This is a log of all deletion discussion nominations made by this user using Twinkle's XfD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

July 2021

 * Go Fish (band): nominated at AfD 04:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NBAND, WP:GNG. Google test gives Lastfm, Facebook, and their own website, none of which are reliable.

August 2021

 * LivHOME: nominated at AfD 03:29, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. None of its claims of services are cited, and everything below the lead reads like an advertisement: "augment its strategic, national growth efforts", "enrich the lives of LivHOME clients". While I can't read the full WSJ article, the first 4.5 paragraphs mention nothing about it, and the business journal just writes about the aquisitions, not about the company itself or what they've done. Catholic Online is not reliable, and the archived 'advance web' page mentions LivHOME once, about the author. No sources indicate notability, and websites that mention it all seem to talk about it's acquisitions. Of the websites on google that talk about it, none are reliable, and some are self-published.

September 2021

 * Iftakar Uddin Emon: nominated at AfD; notified 22:31, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Not a notable subject. Most sourcing right now is Apple Music and Spotify. Fails all of WP:MUSICBIO, and WP:GNG. Sourcing is not reliable, independent, or secondary. WP:GOOGLETEST gives various song links, but no reliable sources.

October 2021

 * Minotaur Hotel: nominated at AfD; notified 04:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails GNG and NRVE. Current sources do not indicate notability, and a search for sources gives either mirrors of the MQGF, or passing mentions. Kotaku article may be the only thing that can be a reliable source, but I am unsure of its significant coverage; it does say the game exists, but only in one paragraph. It was given one Bronze award from a games festival.

June 2023

 * Xconfig: nominated at AfD 04:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails RS, N (NSOFT), V. Not a notable element of the Linux kernel. It has existed since 2005, and has had a sourcing issue since 2009. No reliable significant sources have been found in 18 years, and I doubt any will turn up soon. Some sources do exist that mention xconfig, but it is a passing mention that confirm it exists (EXIST), and it is certainly not the focus of them.

September 2023

 * Sileather (material): nominated at AfD; notified 04:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails NPRODUCT and GNG. There are sources in the article, but none of these satisfy WP:RS, and thus don't contribute towards the product's notability as a separate product; they establish that it exists. Attempts to find sourcing on Google yields articles that a) have no author, b) are clear press releases, c) have no significant coverage, d) are not independent, and/or e) are simply not reliable. TWL has 7 articles that contain the word, but none of them are significant; all mentions are in passing, or in a list amongst many other like products (again, ENN). Google Books contains 1 book that has a passing mention of the material. Likely better included in Artificial leather instead.
 * Spanish Cobras: nominated at AfD; notified 23:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails GNG. It has been edited almost exclusively by one IP editor (although their specific IPv6 has changed, all of them edit in the same pattern and time) since April 2020. Before that, it received little editorial attention. It has had a more citations needed since February 2011. There are nearly no inline citations. It has nearly 0 sources to corroborate the majority of information in the article. Of the 4 that exist, only 1 is reliable and has significant coverage (Chicago Tribune). Attempts to find sources have failed, as nothing that I can find satisfies RS and also has coverage beyond 2 words (or 3). It also reads as a FORUM and is full of ultimately unverifiable information. If it does turn out to be notable, it would be far better to blow it up.

February 2024

 * Archibus: nominated at AfD; notified 04:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NPRODUCT and WP:NOTADVERT. Sources in article are non-reliable (self-published) or press releases. Potential sources are similar press releases and are also not reliable, and thus don't indicate notability; others are simply not WP:RS. Article currently seems to serve as a advertisement of the company's services ("made a strategic growth investment", product catalogue). Searches for other sources are only of one-word passing mentions (such as "software like Archibus,, , etc.") and do not contain any significant coverage.

April 2024

 * Ucodelite: nominated at AfD; notified 04:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails NSOFT (more broadly, GNG) and has some NOTAD plus not NPOV language. BEFORE search turns up no possible reliable sources to indicate notability (or any sources at all, too). Creator copy-pasted draft out of draftspace after a declined AfC.
 * Template:Uw-wnr1: nominated at TfD; notified 04:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Already covered entirely by Uw-hoax; there is no reason for there to be a specific UW template for intentionally fake and made-up hoax versions of Windows. Very likely to never be used.
 * Template:Uw-wnr2: nominated at TfD; notified 04:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Already covered entirely by Uw-hoax; there is no reason for there to be a specific UW template for intentionally fake and made-up hoax versions of Windows. Very likely to never be used. See Uw-wnr1.
 * Template:Uw-wnr3: nominated at TfD; notified 04:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Already covered entirely by Uw-hoax; there is no reason for there to be a specific UW template for intentionally fake and made-up hoax versions of Windows (WNR seems to mean Windows Never Released). Very likely to never be used. See Uw-wnr1.
 * Template:Uw-wnr4: nominated at TfD; notified 04:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Already covered entirely by Uw-hoax; there is no reason for there to be a specific UW template for intentionally fake and made-up hoax versions of Windows (WNR seems to mean Windows Never Released). Very likely to never be used. See Uw-wnr1.
 * Template:Uw-wnr4im: nominated at TfD; notified 04:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Already covered entirely by Uw-hoax; there is no reason for there to be a specific UW template for intentionally fake and made-up hoax versions of Windows (WNR seems to mean Windows Never Released). Very likely to never be used. See Uw-wnr1.