User:Whytcleft/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Christians for Socialism

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

the lead section provides a straightforward definition of the CPS movement, though it lacks anything beyond a single introductory sentence. it would likely benefit from additions of summaries of the later sections, as well as an increased level of detail regarding the introductory information such as centering it's origins beyond simply the year of consolidation.

the seven content sections are fairly on-topic, though most are short and could benefit from expanding the information relevant to said sections and tieing into contemporary movements, one notable example would be expanding upon the distinction of "formal introduction" and connecting the CPS movement with other contemporary groups such as the civil rights movement and the NAACP in the US. there is a definite feel of half-hearted writing upon the topic, it reads as a introductory article that fails to provide an adequate introduction for the ideas presented.

the tone of the article is fairly neutral, though suffers from a sense of casualness that doesn't seem to provide more than a cursory introduction to an otherwise robust and expansive topic.

the article suffers from a cursory nature that doesn't provide much of a substantial introduction to the topic.