User:WikiBeani0/Visual narrative/SpaceAge1 Peer Review

NOTE FROM COURSE INSTRUCTOR: I agree that this article needs more improvement and expansion, particularly in terms of the sources it is drawing upon. And that line Nijah points out about visual narrative being misleading should be better supported, both in terms of a citation and, perhaps, an example. I also agree that there could be more in terms of equity and underrepresentation as visual narratives are themselves very contextual and specific to different sign communities, and many groups use very specific images and symbols in storytelling. More citations from reputable sources might round this out as well.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Angie - @WikiBeani0


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:WikiBeani0/Visual_narrative


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Visual narrative

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Not so much the lead, but the first part of the overview has been updated.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There isn't much to change since there isn'y much in the article itself, but what is presented is relevant to the topic.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? I'm not sure if it is historically underrepresented, but the current page is short and lacking info and sources, so I would say it is currently underrepresented.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? "It can also be used as a form of visual communication as people naturally use stories to understand the world and express their stories with the world. In some circumstances, visual narrative can be misleading, misinformative, or disinformative." This part feels like it's framing the topic in a negative light. I think it would be better to clarify that visual narrative itself isn't misleading, but that the creator can be misled or biased and, in turn, make misleading media.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? I don't think your souce is reliable since it's a blog post and there are no sources listed on it.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) I would recommend finding more reliable sources from places like JSTOR or Google Scholar
 * Check a few links. Do they work? The one included works.