User:WikiCar03/Of Mice and Men (1992 film)/Dreadnaught127 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) WikiCar03


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:WikiCar03/Of Mice and Men (1992 film) - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Of Mice and Men - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The article additions seem a little personalized mainly because of how you don't have any sources cited (or you didn't post them here) other than the phrase "In the book". This phrase could be considered your own personal adaptation/view of what transpired (even if it is entirely true! I ran into this problem because I am also editing a book's wiki) and needs to be backed up. If you don't change this it will affect the tone/balance of the article and will be taken down because it will be viewed as your opinion. The person who reads the addition you make might think the movie is better than the book and might ruffle some feathers with other wikipedians.

If you are looking to add a critical view of the book, I recommend The Essential Criticism of John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men by Michael J. Meyer. I found it with a quick search on the Flite Library database, you should be able to get full access and it should be able to provide plenty of fuel for your edit! https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ferrisstate/reader.action?docID=467187&ppg=14

If you do decide to add your differences, I would recommend adding them under "Adaptations", below the film, radio, and stage subtopics.

Other than those changes, the addition looks good! Nice work.