User:WikiUser481/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Glow & Lovely

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because I used to see these commercials as a kid. They promoted wrong ideas and thus was rebranded. It matters to me because I visit India a lot and I notice colorism in the commercials. My first impression was that it was very short but to the point.

Evaluate the article
The lead is good and to the point. It is concise and has all information included in the article. The content as well is up to date and organized. However it is merely a statement of facts with only a sentence per quotes. Further explanation may be needed. The article is very neutral. It only states facts with no personal opinion at all. Sources and references are cited well. There is one missing "Glow and Lovely contains stearic acid, mainly sourced from animal body fats (like lard) which contain the highest amount of stearic acid by weight compared to plant-based fats." but it can be added. No expansion is provided on citations. The organization and writing quality is amazing but there is not enough content to provide a full overview. So the content and writing is good but it needs more of it. There is only one image to show the cream and to me that is all that is needed. Maybe a before and after could be added. The talk page is non-existent. There is no conversations happening. I believe this is due to the fact that there is not much in the article to talk about. The articles strengths are the writing quality and to the point writing style. It can be improved with more content added as a backstory and more informative way of addressing the material. I think it is 80% complete. It is underdeveloped and needs more information.