User:Wikientry01/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Forensic psychology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because I was interested in what Wikipedia had to offer on forensic psychology, it seems like a topic that could be related to what I want to be in the future.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

This article has a good lead section as it introduces the article clearly and concise and includes everything that is in the article. This article is also up to date because the last time it was revised and updated was November 8th 2022. Their claims in the article seem very neutral as there is no "red flag" words that could lean this article into one direction, from what I saw, there was only one picture, so I wasn't perfect in visual conditions but the one picture they had to offer had a caption that could be building upon the rest of the article. Most of the sources are pretty current from 2017-2018, and I checked a few links, which have worked. This article is part of a Wikiproject (Psychology). In my opinion, the articles overall impression is good as it provides all the information we need that isn't bias and have been checked with multiple sources, something that could be included could be more images and maybe charts of information to agree with the facts they have put. — ~