User:Wikigupta713/Cricket in India/Xstallatsx Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Wikigupta713


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wikigupta713/Cricket_in_India?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cricket in India

Lead
Guiding questions:
 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * New lead has not been added

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Content is relevant
 * Looks at "Portrayal in Popular Culture" and "Commercialization Over the Years", which are both relevant subtopic for Cricket in India
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * There are variations in how recent the data is
 * There are some sections that only refer to data up to 2014 or 2016, while some information is as recent as 2021
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No, the additions seem cohesive and appear to belong
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * It does not

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Not wholly neutral, there are some phrases that imply a bias and mixing in of personal opinion
 * Ex:
 * "An amazing example"
 * "known as one of India's greatest bowlers in cricketing history"
 * "The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is the richest and most powerful cricket board in the world"
 * Going over the page again and screening for any extra words that may add bias would be a good idea. You should ensure that no personal opinion is reflected and objectivity is retained.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, there is no heavy bias towards a particular position
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No, there are not
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, it does not

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Sources are cited frequently
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * There could be more citations as there only 5 sources cited across a very large contribution, which may result in skewed opinions.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Only one source is from 2023, the others are much older. Especially as this is a field with frequently arising/evolving information, more recent sources could be used.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Sources do span a large time period and thereby reflect diverse opinions

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * None
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic
 * Yes, there are also sub-sections within each sub-heading, so the information is very structured

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes, there are new sections being covered, but you have also indicated that some of these may be repitive, please revisit these so that no obsolete information is being added.