User:Wikimol/Arbitration election endorsements

More endosments of this kind can be found at Arbitration Committee Elections Endorements page. Unfortunately, structure and existence of that page is matter of dispute, so, for now, I resort to updating only this page.

Endorsements

 * Charles Matthews - after reading a lot from his edit history I believe he would be good arbitor. IMO also the fact he is spending more time on contributing excelent articles than on wikipolitics is an advantage. Arbitrators should have touch with the work and problems of Main namespace.

I simply endorse, because allready doing good work in Wikipedia comittees and similar structures.


 * User:Sannse
 * User:Jdforrester

Anti-endorsements

 * User:Sam Spade - while carefuly abide by wording of a wikipedia policy, frequently acting completely against spirit of the policy. IMO his intelligent and cultivated, but uncompromising way of pushing his POVs is in global perpective more devastating than obvious trolling. (My judgement is based primary on interaction with Sam Spade on articles Pursuit of Nazi collaborators and Evacuation of East Prussia. Talkpages and histories provide "evidence".)
 * User:VeryVerily - frequently object of arbitration/mediation, breaking policy, obviously not
 * User:SPUI - self-declared troll
 * User:Lir - trolling on the election page