User:Wikistudent100/Spiral of silence/Cmk21 Peer Review

General info
Wikistudent100
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Wikistudent100/Spiral of silence
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Spiral of silence

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

There was no edits or draft for the lead of this article as yet.

Content

For the background section on spiral of silence the added content was relevant to the topic and up to date. The added paragraph belongs with the rest of the existing paragraphs.

Tone and Balance

The tone follows a neutral voice and does not sound biased whatsoever towards any position or idea. It is a very informative tone and all viewpoints are balanced throughout.

Sources and References

All the sources seem reliable and credible sources, supporting the stated information and ideas. Each paragraph that presents a new idea is presented with a linked source that is matched accurately in the references section.

Organization

When looking at the layout and organization, there are a lot of small paragraphs scattered and then one big paragraphs in the middle of all. Perhaps if divided evenly or distributed it might have a cleaner look in terms of organization and flow. There are no grammatical errors and it is all concise. The last paragraph does throw me off a little bit with all the names and dates, it feels excessive and tiring to the eye as a closing paragraph for the section.

Overall impressions

All the content added seemed strong and relevant. Although underlining the added content in the sandbox and edited sections would have made it easier for the peer reviewer to recognize what was added. Otherwise they did a good job in adding new information while following the general tone of the article on spiral of silence theory.