User:Wikitoldmetonotusename/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Baw Baw frog

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Because it was a C-list article that seemed to have little information, as pages like that tend to be more vulnerable to having messy sentences, uncited sources, or other common errors.

Evaluate the article
The article itself has good balance and writing quality, although I did notice one error where an image showed the region from which the Baw Baw frog originated, yet did not state that information in the article itself outside of that. In addition, there is no citation as to the description of the frog itself, which is likely the most important aspect of the article and must be fixed if it is to be a passable one. In addition, there is a lack of conversation and attention to the article, although other than that the lead section and content is well done, although content is paraphrased a bit too closely and should likely be changed to be properly sourced, especially when it comes to the last two sections.