User:Wilktyl/Open government/Rahebradfar Peer Review

General info
Wilktyl
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Wilktyl/Open government


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Open government

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Great job Tyler!

Content: new content is completly relevant to the article. It fills some important key gaps very well and does not duplicate other sections of the article.

Tone and Balance: the added content seems neutral and well balanced.

Sources and References: the new content is fully referenced backed up by reliable sources and represent a variety of perspectives.

Organization: the content added is well written, easy to read, and well organized.

overall Impressions: I believe that the added content definitely improves the quality of article.

I would like to end this review by posing two questions:


 * 1) Where would you add the accountability part in the article?
 * 2) Could you please confirm the Open Government Partnership (OGP) was established by the State Departement?