User:WillWhyNot/sandbox

Article Evaluations

 * 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wetland_conservation

1. The article went a little off topic, talking about tourism however it is tangential. 2. The article seems strongly based in fact and even offers multiple definitions of "wetland", so I don't think it seems very biased. 3. There is almost twice the amount of information about Macedonian wetlands compared to any other area. 4. The citations seem good. Most go to organization websites and look official. 5. There is a section where there is a parenthetical citation used twice without a corresponding citation in the references. 6. There is a lengthy edit history and all source dates are fairly recent. 7. There is one comment asking to consolidate some of the topics. 8. The article is not rated or part of any projects. 9. The article uses more formal scientific language and describes things often using statistics.