User:Williabd/Evaluate an Article

Everything in this article is relevant to the topic (Phobia). Information is up to date and I believe that everything that should be included is there. Article does not underrepresent historically marginalized populations. There are no view points that are underrepresented. As for what could be improved, although there are a great number of phobias mentioned, I believe that more could be included.

There are no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. All links work correctly. Sources support the claims in article. The facts in this article come from reliable sources such as APA, NIMH, and NIHR. The sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications. After checking the talk page, the conversations seem educational and school related. The article is rated as B class and is apart of WikiProject Psychology and WikiProject Medicine.

The article is well developed, well written, and clear with no grammatical errors.

Which article are you evaluating?
Phobia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because phobia seems like an interesting topic to read and learn about. I think it matters because most of us have phobias that we just don't know the name of and don't know that it is considered a phobia.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)