User:Williamsj88/The Three Sisters (Alberta)/Openoyer Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I don't think you changed the lead.

The content is relevant and up to date. I don't think it is about an underrepresented topic.

The tone is neutral and unbiased. There aren't viewpoints that are over or underrepresented and there is no persuasion.

You may not have enough references, I think I only see a couple. But, the ones you have are reliable and apply to the topic. You should use more of what the sources say in the draft. There are more peer reviewed sources available too. The links you have work.

It is broken down into concise sections that apply to the topic. There are no grammatical or spelling errors.

There are no images or media, so that section doesn't apply.

This is not a new article either, so it doesn't apply.

I would say to just add more information and sources, but the information right now is good and adds to the article.