User:Willjco02/United Airlines circular economy initiatives/Ginbarce03 Peer Review

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * No lead. Maybe here explain what each category is, there are topics that need further research to be understood at face value.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Content added
 * What is circular economy in aviation?
 * What does sustainability in the aviation industry look like?
 * What does Sustainable aviation fuel initiative mean?
 * Content is good but there is stuff that is difficult to understand without more research on the topic
 * Content added is up-to-date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Article deals with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. Address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Content added is neutral. Claims do not appear heavily biased toward a particular position. Viewpoints are represented accurately but can be expanded upon. Content added does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Content added is well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic.


 * Content added is clear, concise and easy to read.
 * Reread for clarity of sentences that they are organized properly but they can be understood.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * Content expands knowledge on sustainable aviation
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Check to make sure citations are properly inputted

Overall good. I think just expand on what things mean so no further extensive research is required by the reader. Article is informative!

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)