User:Willjco02/United Airlines circular economy initiatives/Pablo Cancelo Peer Review

General info
Willjco2
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Willjco02/United Airlines circular economy initiatives:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Lead

 * Lead has a solid start. Information is there; weaving together and synthesis of information is needed.
 * No intro sentence; however, the bones of the article are there.
 * Lead has brief intro to the major sections; I can see where the article is going.
 * Lead does not have info for things not contained in the article.
 * Lead is unstructured at the moment. As a final product, I implore the authors to make the article's lead concise and brief.

Content

 * Content sections seem relevant and well written (bonus points for the length/detail of each section)
 * Content seems up to date. However, please see sources section.
 * At the moment, the direction of the article is clear but a "future of" topic may be of value to use.

Tone and Balance

 * Content added is neutral and in Wikipedia's voice.
 * I suggest that authors look at the neutrality of their working on ecological and sustainability statements and make sure they are always neutral - they are at the moment, but I always implore further review of this neutrality.

Sources and References

 * All sources are neutral, verified, and are in good standing with Wikipedia regulations
 * Content reflects links.
 * Articles are a variety of length, backgrounds, and authors.
 * Links work.
 * Links are simply pasted in, having them in true citation format will be better for readers and reviewers to understand the context in which the supporting articles were written.