User:Willow1500/Evaluate an Article

Lead intro sentence is good and concise.

Lead doesn’t describe article’s major sections.

All the aspects of the topic have about the same weight of information.

The last section about the death and legacy could be rewritten with new information.

The content seems to be up to date.

It doesn’t deal with equity gaps.

Tone is neutral but article only mentions positive things about sangallo.

Personal life of sangallo isn’t mentioned.

The article’s positivity can make the reader think of sangallo as a very important person.

The article relies mostly on a single source and only has 3 different sources.

The content is well developed but more information could be added in general.

The images are well captioned and well layer out but more images are necessary.

All the sources are secondary and peer reviewed articles.

Picture of the palazzo Farnese I nominated to be deleted.

There are just 2 conversations about the article.

Sources don’t include historically marginalized individuals, they include 2 books and a jstor journal.

The links work.