User:Willraschkowan/Floating man/Peanutbutter.05 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Alexb888, Ffaa88, Reagy64, Tim1113


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Willraschkowan/Floating_man&action=edit Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

There is no content added as the lead. The content added supports the topic well. Since the source was only published in 2013, the content is up-to-date. However, there might be some major changes needed since some of the content is plagiarized. The article does not deal with any of Wikipedia's equity gaps and it does relate to René Descartes. The content added is neutral and does not appear bias toward any particular position. The section called "Floating man and Descartes's Cogito" could be elaborated better. The content does not attempt to persuade the reader in favour of one position or away from another. Although the source supports the topic very well, there seems to be plagiarism in the section "Background". The added link does seem to function properly. There seems to be one author in the source. The content is easy to read, but there are some spelling and grammar mistakes. The sections are well divided by sub-topic. The article does not include any images. The article seems to be improved after the additions made. The content added is related to a good source which helps support the topic well. The content could be better if it had more description in the section "Floating man and Descartes's Cogito". Plagiarism is equally quite problematic in the article, so it is crucial for changes to be made in those sections.