User:WillsAnthonyS2/Paradoryphoribius/Sprousm Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

WillsAnthonyS2


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Paradoryphoribius
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The page looks great especially the taxonomy box, Overal this is a great start. The tone is concise and neutral. The content is accurate and from credited peer review primary articles. The only one I'm not 100% confident in is the 4th source. I was under the impression it could only be peer reviewed primary research article, so I would just double check that one.You have some sources listed just need some more to meet the requirements for the project. Organization is good and visuals. The information is relevant and well written. The only thing to add is just more details and sources.