User:WillyT17/Evaluate an Article

Lead section

- Article leads with introductory that clearly describes article

- Includes brief description of article's major sections

- Does not

- Very concise

Content

- Relevant

- up-to-date

- Citations missing (7 needed total)

- Yes, covers most

Tone and Balance

- Article is neutral

- No bias claims

- Market Failure and Inequality lack information

- Minority viewpoints represented

- Does not persuade

Sources and References

- No, some lack citations

- sources that are there are thorough

- some current, not all

- written by diverse authors

- better sources probably available, some are outdated

- links work

Organization and Writing Quality

- Concise and easy to read

- No grammatical errors

- Broken down into sections and paragraphs well

Images and Media

- Does have helpful images, I think the right amount. Could maybe use a couple more

- Images definitely well-captioned

- follow copyright requirements

- Laid out in appealing way

Talk Page Discussion

- Conversations about edits like switching the title name to 'criticisms' (plural) and introduction of more criticisms

- it is rated high-importance in politics, mid-importance in philosophy, high-importance of economics, top-importance of socialism

- it is related to technology in some sections, but not all. a lot on Marx (as expected) which I don't think we have covered

Overall Impressions:

- good status, of high importance to many fields

- article excels in explanation of criticisms of capitalism through different schools of thought

- citations need to be improved

- it is definitely well-developed, just needs citations for 7 sources to make it approved and complete

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)