User:Wilthethrill06/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Legal debate

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose Legal debate because I wanted to see how detailed the page would be. Attending Law School exposes students to a lot of legal debates happening in the United States. Of course, it would be time consuming to write about each one. The

Evaluate the article
 Lead section 

Lead section gives a quick overview of the entire article. I think it could summarize the details a little better but this section works.

 Content 

The content is relevant, however the content is not as up-to-date as it should be. I think more content/details on other legal debates and legal jurists would be helpful.

 Tone and Balance 

The tone and balance is neutral. They don't seem to be claims that are heavily biased toward a particular position. It does mention Justice Scalia as an example one side of a legal debate, however the article doesn't get into details about that.

''' Is the article neutral? '''

Yes, the article is neutral, but it is also very surface level. It doesn't get much into the legal debates and the different sides. For instance, like explaining the debate between Originalism and living constitutionalism.

 Sources and References 

Sources and references are lacking. The writer could've cited cases or academic articles as examples of some of the legal debates happening today.

 Organization and writing quality 

The writing is clear. The organization is great, but I think they should add more to it. There are no grammatical errors in my initial reading.

 Images and Media 

No images or media. I think that it would have been helpful to add some images of key cases regarding the legal debates. Maybe also including pictures of the top jurists.

 Talk page discussion 

There is nothing on the talk page. It would be helpful if folks added some ideas to the topic to help expand the bare page.

''' Overall impressions '''Great start but more is desired.

— ~.