User:Wisden17/Archive 2

Re: Mediation Committee Business
Thank you for the prompt response; I'll respond on the respective page. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note? ) 23:09, 19 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually, the neutral was just temporary; I would like some more time but am definitely leaning towards support and will probably do so within the next few days, if not sooner. While I would like to see some more experience on your part (and also echo Drini's sentiment), to use an old cliché, I like what I see. Some things that are holding me back, right now, though, are your views on Jimbo's "ultimate" power - while I respect your views, I would like to disagree with them (and the account is Dannyisme, by the way) - and the relative lack of experience. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note? ) 21:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

ATTENTION MODERATORS
DO NOT ADD ANY NEW USERS Eagle talk
 * For somereason the add user function is adding duplicate copies of EVERY name on the list. (currently I am undoing the damage... so give me time) if there is ANY other problems please contact me immediatly!!
 * Give me time to at least fix the damage that has already been caused, Then I will respond to any messages that you guys have Thanks

--Eagle talk 19:40, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Incorrect Admonishment
Wisden17 told me I vandalised the page on the movie The Notebook, which I had not even seen until he provided a link to it. I resent the standardised debasing language he used (vandalised, etc.), and the sloppy application of justice.

Be more careful in whom you call out for these things.

On a side note, it would be interesting to see what the vandalism was that I was accused of. Just out of curiosity.


 * I'm not aware of any warning be given to you, and from looking at my contributions and your talk page none appears to have been given. Are you, therefore, referring to an edit you made whilst not logged in (i.e. simple using an IP Address)? I appear to have warned User:206.148.148.56 regarding vandalism to this page, but that was over 2 months ago, is this what you are talking about? --Wisd e n17 16:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
...for reverting vandalism to my user page. Cheers. Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  )  18:59, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

aiv
PER THIS Thanks :) Dlohcierekim 19:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

RFM: Medical Analysis of Circumcision
Thanks for the note, I've added it to my watchlist. Jayjg (talk) 21:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

CorbinSimpson's Request for Adminship
Thanks for voting in my request for administrator rights, even though it failed (13/30/4). Sadly, work has forced me to respond to you all using a substituted message rather than a personalized response. Anyway, I just wanted to let you know that administrators, to me, should be chosen and approved by the community, and I will continue working to become a better editor and Wikipedian. No matter what the alignment of your vote was, I will take your comments seriously and use them to improve myself. If you wish to discuss your comments personally with me, I would be more than glad to talk about things since the RfA is now over; just leave your concern on my talk page and we will sort things out. Thanks again for voting, and happy editing! -  Corbin  Be excellent 

Mediation Committee
It is my pleasure to announce that after great consideration, you have been accepted as a member of the Mediation Committee. I encourage you to place the Mediation Committee page and Requests for Mediation on your watchlist, as well as the open tasks page, which will be updated as new cases are accepted. You may also (and are encouraged to) join the Committee's internal mailing list. If you have any questions about how the committee functions, please feel free to ask me. Congratulations on becoming a member! Essjay ( Talk  • Connect  ) 05:53, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Concordia newsletter
 Concordia Newsletter Community Justice is no more. It has been reformed to Concordia. Membership has been transferred.

Concordia is an organization of editors on Wikipedia that strive to encourage civility and fair treatment among all editors in the Wikipedian community, from the Wikignome to the Wikiholic. The project was designed to have a friendly and helpful environment to support any unfortunate Wikipedians that have become victims of incivility, hostility, or continual disrespect.

We currently need help in getting going, and making the community understand our aims. We work for civility. Nothing more, nothing less.

If you have ideas, let us know at our talk page, or on the IRC channel. We aim to spread civility in every way we can.

Should you wish to unsubscribe to future newsletters, please add your name to Concordia/Do Not Spam.

Thank you for your time. If you need anything, feel free to comment at WT:CCD or come into our IRC channel.

- The Concordia council. Delivered by Ian13 13:17, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

FAC (Worcester)
I'm afraid I have to run IE because my computer's having issues right now, which at the present time are unknown. I've tried other programs, but my computer seems to crash with others... I have to get it looked at soon. As for a screen shot, I'll try, but with my computer the way it is right now, it doesn't seems likely. Sorry I can't be of more help, RyanG e rbil10 00:49, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * If you don't mind, I took it into my own hands to fix picture alignment issues, and I found a spelling error, which I fixed. Happy to be of help, RyanG e rbil10 14:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage! NawlinWiki 16:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Your userpage
No problem, all in a day's work. I was checking your listing on WP:AIV and the IP just happened to have vandalised your page 10 seconds before I loaded his contribs - nice and simple, just how it should be :-) -- Cactus.man  &#9997;  17:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Roosevelt
Thanks for the comment, but I'm still at a loss. I've read the guidelines. In changing Teddie to Teedie, all I was doing was correcting a typo (as I've done about 1000 times before, as un unregistered user)--not asserting a disputable fact or matter of opinion. A Google search of "teedie roosevelt" provides ample evidence in support of the change. Have the rules changed wildly in the past 48 hours? Or did I just stumble onto a particularly sensitive page? Thanks. Azaner 23:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
, thank you for participating in my RfA. Unfortunately, a great number of oppose voters felt that I lacked experience, and a consensus was not reached (the final tally was 30/28/10). Perhaps I will try again in another few months when I have a few more edits under my belt. If I do, I hope I can count on your support. Thanks again!

Cool3 talk 20:51, 2 June 2006 (UTC) (UTC)

Belated
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. Cheers -- Samir  धर्म 09:28, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Royal Grammar School Worcester
I am an Old Boy of RGS, having left a few years ago. D301ds 13:59, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Requests for mediation/Medical analysis of circumcision
Could you update me on the status of this mediation? The last word I see is me saying go ahead and them saying they'd trimmed the parties some; did it ever get off the ground, or have we all missed each other in passing? I was closing out stale cases today and couldn't find any report on what was taking place; when you get the chance, if you could either post a note there on the mediation's page, or to my talk page, it would be greatly appreciated. :) Essjay ( Talk  • Connect  ) 15:13, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Gallery (photos)
Hello Wisden17. For an example of a page which uses a gallery to show numerious photographs take a look at the page for tower bridge in London. --New t on2 16:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Reply: PWB
You said your willing to help with the Pokémon articles, so the thing I wanted help with is that I need someone to add

to every single Pokémon article's talk page.

Please leave a note to say you have read this, thanks. If you do a good job, i'll give you a barnstar as my thanks. I Love Minun (talk) 19:51, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Portal:Politics
Hi - I've commented on the politics portal's WP:FPORT nomination and declared my support. It is a very tidy portal and its ergonomics are very good. Another user has been particularly critical of the portal - I would not like you to take this too seriously - read my comments before reacting too much. There is a problem at the moment that conventions are being assumed as gospel, but conventions are there to be broken. Furthermore, I am a strong believer in the individuality of portals - each portal should reflect its topic area in a sensible way.

Anyway, I thought I'd just drop you a line to let you know my views. Good portal - keep up the good work. DJR (Talk) 21:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

I was away fishing, now caring for Mom (bipolar/dementia)
Sorry I had to leave, and left the circumcision topic mediation unattended. Is there anything I can still do?

There are three editors that dominate ... agree to fixes (accurate study "conclusions," ect.), then slash or revert to fit their personal perspective (but luckily left all the pro-circ bias).

I plan to rewrite the intro(s), then parallel publish ... at least in the Rfc. Would you like to see the outline and articles first?TipPt 04:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)