User:Wisemonkey07/Parrot astrology/Nikitalee02 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Wisemonkey07


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Parrot astrology


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Parrot astrology

Evaluate the drafted changes
Peer Review

Lead:

It does not look like the lead has been updated to reflect any new content. The introductory sentence of the lead clearly describes what the article is about.The lead does not seem to include a description of the article's major sections, but all of the information present in the lead is also present in the article.The lead is concise and detailed enough to convey what the article is about.

Content:

The content is relevant to the topic of Parrot Astrology, however the content does not appear to be up to date. All content of the article seems to be accurate and complete.

Tone and Balance:

The tone of the added content is neutral. There does not seem to be any kind of bias towards any particular position and everything seems to be equally represented. There is no sense of persuasion of any kind in this article, the tone remains neutral and informative throughout.

Sources and References:

There is not much new content but the existing content has pretty good secondary sources. For the most part, the cited sources and the content are reflective. For the lack of available and accessible content on this topic, I feel that the author of this article did a good job finding sources and citing them appropriately. The sources are pretty current considering the topic. There are sources available here in the library in cottonwood. I am not sure how current they are or if they are peer reviewed, but they are different from the sources listed and probably offer more information on the topic. The links in the article work well.

Organization:

The added content is clear, concise and easy to read. There are no spelling or grammatical errors. The added content is well-organized

Images and Media:

The images in the article enhance the understanding of the topic. They are well-captioned and they adhere to Wikipedias copyright regulations. The way the images are laid out is visually appealing.

Overall this article is laid out well and the content is very well presented. Great job!