User:Wittlj/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this page because much of my undergraduate study and research has been ecology based. I am also in a Limnology course and ecology heavily influences the study of Limnology. Human ecology is important because it encompasses many fields of study and how humans are interacting with the social, built, and environmental world. My preliminary impression of the article is that it seems fairly reliable and well put together.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section is a nice, concise overview of what human ecology is. It gives an overview of what sections will follow.

The content seems good with evenly distributed information. There could be more overall content and some disciplines of ecology could be expanded upon. The content is up to date and people have been actively updating the article.

The article is written from neutral stances with no heavy biases.

There are diverse sources that are fairly up to date. There are some sources that are a bit older but there are plenty of relevant sources. The source links work.

Organization and writing style are easy to follow. There are no obvious grammatical errors.

There are not many images but the ones that are present are captioned well. The available image is not copyrighted. The talk page is not as extensive as I thought it would be. The article is apart of multiple Wikiprojects. The article is rated C-class of high importance.

Overall this article is not bad. It could be improved some but there are no serious issues.