User:Wittlj/Lake Okeechobee/Maddyvotypka Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Wittlj


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wittlj/Lake_Okeechobee?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Lake Okeechobee

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
There is no lead yet.

Content
The content was related to the current article and filled in a gap that was there. Your information was important to know. Some of the sentences seem to be very similar to each other, if you could somehow try and make them a little different especially in the second paragraph.

Tone and Balance
The information is neutral however, some of the wording is not neutral when presenting the information such as "relatively shallow" ,"only" and "long fetch". Instead of using these types of words you can just state how long and how deep Lake Okeechobee. Also, with your first sentence you dont want to start a sentence with the word "Because". This article needs to be reviewed because there are some spelling issues and some words that dont belong in the sentence.

Sources and References
The content contains multiple references and they all seem to be reliable resources. The links are working and bring you to the article that the information is from. There are also sources found next to the information that it is related to.

Organization
The content has sub-headings which separate the information in a way that the reader can better understand what each topic is.

Images and Media
There are no images or media currently. Make sure to add one image at least.

Overal Impressions
Overall, the article is well written and has quite a bit of relevant information. The strengths of this article is the amount of information you have included and how you have organized the article in subheadings.