User:Wludwiko/sandbox

This is a test. Bold text appears with three apostrophes around it Italic texts appears with two apostrophes around it The links icon allows addition of link. The picture icon allows for insertion of image. The book icon adds a reference. Advanced functions allow for creation of headings at five different levels, bulleted and numbered lists, unformatted text, subscripts and superscripts, small and large text, captions, redirections, and tables. I am uncertain what the arrow icon in Advanced functions does. Many special characters exist. At the bottom of the page, there is a box that allows for a summarization of edits.

Article Evaluation: Glass Ceiling
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * The article starts by focusing on the glass ceiling, identifying it as a metaphor and linking to another page covering the gender pay gap; however, the article diverts its attention from the glass ceiling to other pay-related metaphors.
 * Many sentences are short and choppy, and some punctuation issues exist.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is fairly neutral, presenting arguments against glass ceiling.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Yes, the links work, and the sources support the claims in the article.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Some facts do not have references (e.g., "Although people argue that the gender pay gap is not relevant anymore, statistics show that it will take at least 70 years from now for the gap to close.")
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Generally, the references span from the time that the term was coined to the present.
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * Lots of interesting conversations occur behind the scenes of this article. Some folks think that the article is biased from a feminist perspective, and some think that the article focuses too much on women rather than minorities.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * I think the article is rated as an article that could have free content incorporated from elsewhere. It is a part of 6 WikiProjects.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * Are we supposed to be answering these questions ourselves, or is this an example assignment for students?