User:Woodis9/Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity/ErinNHolman Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.


 * 1) Is it obvious to you which sections of the article have been revised? Is the new content relevant to the topic? Yes. Added material fits in well, helpful for explanation and increases knowledge in the subject
 * 2) What does the article do well? Is     there anything from your review that impressed you? Any particular     information that you found especially informative. The added section on     other medical applications was able to use the information previously     discussed and applying it to something that everyone should know about,     which is vaccines. This help put the knew learned ADCC technique into a     new perspective.
 * 3) What overall adjustments do you     suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?     What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the     article? A possible adjustment would be to explain what each abbreviated     name stood for. For example, what does NK stand for? There were multiple abbreviated     terms, not sure if that’s just the name or if they mean something else.     This could help the reader understand even more about the topic.
 * 4) Did you notice anything about the     article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let     them know. No.
 * 5) Is all new content backed up by a reliable source of     information? Four new sources were added for the new material but there     are a few sentences that do not have any sources or links to back up the     added statements.  
 * 6) Are the sources fairly current (> 2015)? Check a few     links. Do they work? All links work. The fourth source, however, is     from 1993. But it is used to back up how a well-known bacterium that has     been studied for a while has affected something fairly new.
 * 7) Summarize any     typographical/grammatical errors that you found. I do not believe to     have seen any grammatical or typographical errors.
 * 8) Student authors are responsible     for all images on their page (even if not part of their revised subsection).     Double check the original page to make sure images are acceptable and     clearly described. See associated tutorial to review Wiki image     requirements. Summarize your findings. No images.
 * 9) Identify at least one additional     reference that you think may contribute to the article. Explain why you     think this article would benefit from the new information. Be sure to     provide the reference in your write-up. An additional source should be     added in order to back up the statement that NK cells behave like memory     cells. I do not have the source for it, but in order to know that it is     factual, there needs to be a source. In addition to that, an article found     on PubMed explains what an NK is and stands for to clarify the name. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30808985