User:Woodssam1

Dyadic Communication
Dyadic Communication Dyadic Communication is the communication between two people who interact face to face as senders and receivers, even telephone conversations are dyadic in their communication efforts. A lasting communication of ideas between two persons for long duration of time or, of any intensive duration of deeper impact, may be called dyadic communication". By contrast, a sudden communication between two persons In the street and not continued afterwards or not having lasting after-affect on each other cannot be termed as dyadic communication.  For example, two people engaged in a conversation while on an airplane headed to the same destination cannot be classified as dyadic communication.

Effects on Human Relationships
Dyadic Communication is largely defined as Interpersonal Communication, which is usually defined by communication scholars describing participants who are dependent upon one another and have a shared history. It can involve one on one conversations or individuals interacting with many people within a society. An example of an a one on one dyadic communication is when two friends that have grown up together make contact after an extensive period of time come together over a meal and rehash old times, hence a lasting communication of ideas between tow persons for a long duration of time. Dyadic Communication is considered to be of two types: Formal and Informal. Some examples of Formal dyadic communications are interviews, confessions or counseling. Some Informal examples are chatting between friends and family, and teasing.

Effects on Interpersonal Relationships
Dyadic communication between two people takes on great significance because communication is based upon several things. It’s the ability to attend to others and to the focus of interaction, to initiate and respond within interaction and to direct the attention of others for the purpose of establishing joint focus on objects or events. Communication involves comprehension of words, body language, and many other actors that constitute communication between two people. So the consensus is that dyadic communication is a functional communication as compared to dysfunctional communication. The effects of dyadic communication in interpersonal relationships are irreversible and inevitable. This means you cannot ever take back something you have said. It involves social rules or expectations of how you act during a conversation. Different cultures have different ways of expressing themselves; for example, children communicate differently with their parents than they do with their close friends. It also changes with technology; case and point: cell phones, instant messaging, and email have changed the way we communicate.

Effects on Group and Organizational Communication
Group and organizational activities, interactions, and relations may be hindered or facilitated by a variety of features. Strictures such as how people make decisions, and office/departmental structuring that distances decision makers from experiencing the impact of their decisions and consequently, have the effect of impeding learning. The structural system also changes when frequency of communication changes.