User:Wquon/Chen Hengzhe/Siyi Shen Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Wquon
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Wquon/Chen Hengzhe

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? The paragraph added is about New Culture Movement, the content of the Lead.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? So far, the lead contains all the section of the article.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, but it will be better if there is obvious evidence like what she wrote for the magazines during the New Culture Movement.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes. Oc.22
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No, there is no content related to ant historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? About "incorporating values", I think the evidence is not enough to support. Although there are several works mentioned in the paragraph, those evidence do not reflect how she incorporated.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, the paragraph mainly focuses on delivering the fact.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? One source is mainly discuss about Cheng Hengzhe. Another one, there is a chapter about Cheng Hengzhe and the period of New Culture Movement.
 * Are the sources current?Yes, one is 2012, another one is 2016.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Both sources are written by Denise Gimpel. The sources are reviewed by other editors.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, all work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The content concise with topic sentence and support sentences.There are also explanations about the examples.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No, any grammatical or spelling errors.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The content is consistent with the major points of the topic.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, but the content added still under the New Culture Movement. Other section should be added.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The content is clear and objective. The paragraph added is informative.
 * How can the content added be improved? According to the subtitle, something should be added focusing on contribution. The content added do tell what she did during the New Culture Movement, but not really obvious. In fact, the article is mainly about Chen Hengzhe's role in the movement. As the a famous female writer during the New Culture Movement. From my perspective, the main topic of the content add is too similar to the article. It is better to add a new section including all her works. Although the content does not overlap, there is still a section of New Culture Movement to list her contribution in the article.