User:Writ100beloit2017/be bold

"Article evaluation"

Article I chose: "Border" Border

・Everything in the article was relevant to the border by defining what the border is, explaining history, and listing different types of frontiers.

・The article was neutral, focusing more on facts. The article didn't have biased information, because they explained history, facts, and showed actual borders as examples with pictures.

・Most of the links work. However, I found few of the sources that might be old. Still, they do support the claims in the article.

・For the source used in this article, most of them can be said that they are reliable. However, they are the source from universities, newspaper (Los Angelas Times) and some other small institutions, so I'm not sure if all of these organizations have neutral viewpoints and claims.

・They put many examples for natural borders. However, they were less example with fewer details for other kinds of borders such as fiat borders and relict borders. They can add more information here.

・When I checked the talk box, I found out that this article was only written by a single person, I was surprised about this.

・The article was rated level 4 in the Geography section. It was part of 6 WikiProjects.

・My overall impression for this article is that it was neutral and had a good amount of information( not a lot, not less) and it was easy to follow the facts. However, when I where the information came from, I wasn't sure if the origin is reliable or not. I think this article can be improved, by adding the information for "Classification of Borders."