User:Writingwriter48/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
LinkedIn

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I was assigned it.

Evaluate the article
The science section doesn't have enough information in it and looks incomplete. "Massive amounts of data from LinkedIn allow scientists and machine learning researchers to extract insights and build product features. For example, this data can help to shape patterns of deception in resumes.(205)" Source 205 extracts way too little information of the article it's quoting. It doesn't tell you what the research suggested. It is also not concise, not clear, and surely not easy to read. I will be adding a quote from source 205 on the page, and describing what they meant in more detail in my own words. Criticism and controversies remains neutral despite being of a controversial nature. It was clear that another Wikipedia writer took their time to write this unbiased and clearly, being careful only to state facts and quotes from good sources. The initial image of the homepage in the top right is of a very low resolution and low quality, it should probably be updated with an up to date picture of their changed homepage and be of a higher resolution to it can be seen with clarity.