User:Wsprad74/Fort Union National Monument (History of the fort section)/Historian11233 Peer Review

General info
( < User:Wsprad74)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Wsprad74/Fort Union National Monument (History of the fort section):

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article Fort Union National Monument (History of the fort section) that is being updated and added to. The lead gives a great idea on what the article will cover. The introduction sentence to the article is stated loud and clear. There is content that is missing, however the author has a outline on what they are planing to add later down the road. The content that has been added is neutral and gives a neutral perspective to the article. The organization of the content is good and the content is well written. The content is clear and understandable. The article has yet to have any pictures or media added to it. The new content is backed up a good secondary sources that supports the content. Overall the article sounds good and just needs more content.