User:WutUpJut/Interactive media/Jnolan27 Peer Review


 * Whose work are you reviewing?

WutUpJut


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:WutUpJut/Interactive_media?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes[edit]

 * Lead
 * I thought the lead was done well. The overall explanation of interactive media in the start of the draft was well written.
 * Content
 * The content provided was certainly in depth. I thought the explanations of interactive media's effects on certain areas of life was well written, and a good idea to include.
 * Tone & Balance
 * I thought the tone was on par, as well as the balance of the draft. Surely the final version will be an interesting read!
 * Sources and References
 * The sources and references were used well. It certainly added more credibility and reliability to the article.
 * Organization
 * I thought the organization of the draft was good. The live version of the article will certainly be well written based on the organization of the content.
 * The sources and references were used well. It certainly added more credibility and reliability to the article.
 * Organization
 * I thought the organization of the draft was good. The live version of the article will certainly be well written based on the organization of the content.
 * I thought the organization of the draft was good. The live version of the article will certainly be well written based on the organization of the content.