User:Wwwwolf/Classics

Here are some of my pointers to all sorts of weird debates and incidents that kind of raised my eyebrows. I'm not involved in many of these debates and sometimes I might not even endorse them in current consensus-climate of Wikipedia; I just found them odd, interesting and in their own ways educational. Please, ponder the implications.


 * Articles for deletion/Robert Stanek
 * Sockpuppets can't get everything deleted. In fact, they rarely can get anything deleted for sure. (Note that later on, WP:BLP and just plain common sense seems to have prevailed.)


 * Requests for comment/Jason Gastrich
 * Sockpuppeting for Higher Power can't get things deleted, either.


 * User:Nandesuka/Young Zaphod Sockpuppetry
 * MUDs are wonderful. At times, they're really wonderful. It's just that some MUD drivers aren't really as popular and revolutionary as can be non-demonstrated. (An outstanding example of background investigation, here)


 * User:Durova/Complex vandalism at Joan of Arc
 * The curious incident of inserting ramblings in the night-time. (Another outstanding example of investigation)


 * Articles for deletion/Übersite
 * I apologise. I sometimes have to Explain Things.


 * Articles for deletion/Janicism
 * The proponents do not appear to push what we in the wikilawyering industry call "compelling evidence".


 * Articles for deletion/Siberian Technicolor Snail
 * Tee hee.

Fascinating Essays

 * User:Einsidler/Some argue
 * Some Argue® is officially Bad Style® and Not Neutral®.