User:WynnUCBA/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating ?
FC Cincinnati

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I am choosing this article because I love soccer and FCC is doing pretty good in the 2023 season and I think they will be really good for the future years. I also think now with Messi coming to the MLS it will change and how many people watching will grow. This article matters because people need to know the background of the MLS and also how FCC grew in their franchise because FCC is a new club. The founder of FCC went to my High School St Xavier. lastly my preliminary impression of this article was pretty cool I learned new things that I did not know like the Merge.

Evaluate the article
lead section

- yes the introductory sentence clearly describes the article's topic

- no the lead the lead does not include a brief overview of the article's main section

- no the lead does not include information that is not present in the article

- the lead is concise

Content

-yes the articles content is relevant to the topic

- no the content is not up to date it is missing the 2023 season matches and what went on.

- some content that is missing is more about the players and the season that FCC is having in 2023

- no the article does not talk about topics related to historical underrepresented populations

tone and balance

-yes the article is neutral

-there are no claims that appear biased

-there are no viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented

- minority or fringe viewpoints are not accurately described

- the article does not attempt to pursued the reader.

sources and references

- yes they are backed up by information

-yes the sources are thorough

- some of the sources are current and up to date

-yes the sources are written from a diverse spectrum of authors.

- I couldn't find if there were any better sources but the sources they have right now are pretty reliable

- yes the links work

organization and writing quality

-the article id decently written and pretty concise

-it does not appear that the article has miss spelled words

-the article is decently well organized but can be better. it is broken down into section that refer to the topic

images and media

-yes the article uses images to enhance the understanding of the article

-yes the images are well captioned

-yes all the images adhere to the copywrite restrictions

-yell the images are appealing

talk page discussion

-there was talk about the Columbus crew being rivals with FCC which is now in the article

- topic is related to the MLS

-I don't think it defers from the way we discuss in class

overall impressions

-the articles overall status is pretty good but can be a lot better just because they are missing some key details and do not have enough information.

-the articles strengths is the images and the sources sited

- the article can be improved by adding what happened in the 2023 season because there is no in formation about FCC in 2023

-i would say the article is decently developed but not fully

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)