User:Wyogirl1/Lourdes Huanca Atencio/Hanwein Peer Review

General info
Wyogirl1
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Wyogirl1/Lourdes Huanca Atencio
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):n/a

Lead
This section is well written with good citations, but it could be written more precisely. The opening sentence is informational, but many of the phrases are run-ons. While there is a lot of information in the lead section, not all of the overall sections of the article are covered. I would recommend letting your sections carry the details of recognition and potentially organizations, instead including an overview of the impacts of her political activism/foundation.

Content
The content of your article is both relevant and up-to-date. Below, you will see my commentary on primary sourcing which is the main issue I might have with the content. The article certainly deals with an equity gap in Wikipedia which needs to be addressed, and the presence of this topic would increase necessary representation. I am not confident that there needs to be an entire section on FILAC though, I feel this could be explained under one of the other headings pretty easily.

Tone and Balance
The tone of the article is neutral, focused solely on being informative. No one aspect is overrepresented or underrepresented, or biased in any way. No notes here :)

Sources and References
Most of the sources look great and are very informative! Ensure that your reference section does not have error messages (i.e. : Check date values in:   (help)). Currently I see this issue on the following references: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 23. Make sure you are not repeating sources in your reference section, instead use the "reuse citation" button so that it doesn't create a whole new reference for the same source. Furthermore, there appear to be a couple primary sources included in your references (specifically numbers 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 23) which are sadly not permitted on Wikipedia. If any of these are indeed primary sources, you will need to pull the information from your article in order to be approved by Wikipedia, which may majorly alter its state.

Organization
As I stated before, I would consider filing the FILAC section into one of the other headings. Make an effort to create more concise sentences as it is a little wordy right now. I have not noticed any major spelling or grammatical issues other than some run-on sentencing.

Images and Media
I appreciate the picture included of her, it is always helpful to have a face to match with a name. You can probably shorten the caption of the image to one sentence to keep it succinct. If there are any other photos of her at protests or working with her organization, this may supplement the article even further.

Notability
The article is well supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources, though the primary ones will need to be removed. This may impact the notability since the content could be altered. There is a good diversity of source type/media type which is excellent. The linkage to other articles looks good as well. Overall, this is a great topic and a well done article.