User:XPatK/Kingdom 3/280282colum Peer Review

General info
XPatK
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:XPatK/Kingdom 3
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
This is a really good start to the project. The tonality of the article is neutral which is good but does sound a bit bookish. I'm not sure if there's a way to differentiate your verbiage so it sounds a little less copy and paste. There were just a few sentences that I would tweak to polish up the punctuation. what you wrote isn't wrong but there are some instances where you can be more concise. For example "An adaptation of the manga of the same name by Yasuhisa Hara, the film is the sequel to Kingdom 2: Far and Away(2022)." could be written as: The film is an adaptation of the manga by Yasuhisa Hara and is a sequel to Kingdom 2: Far and Away(2022). But that's just a suggestion.

There are an adequate number of references and a good amount of hyper links added. The structure of the article is uniform.

One suggestion for adding content would be to add a plot section. I've seen this done on other wikipedia articles and feel like it may be useful for you.