User:Xena741/New sandbox

Article: Phenypressin

Sources:

1) General and Comparative Endocrinology

Volume 51, Issue 2, August 1983, Pages 309-315:

Marsupial neurohypophysial hormones: Identification of mesotocin, lysine vasopressin, and phenypressin in the quokka wallaby (Setonix brachyurus)

2) https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/56658409

3) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7432483

4) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1399-3011.1982.tb02617.x

5) https://www.nature.com/articles/287640a0

Article Evaluation: "C-Terminus"

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Everything in the article is relevant to the topic with no distractions. Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? Everything seems up to date and complete. What else could be improved? I think more visuals would improve the article. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No bias. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? The links work and the sources Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Each fact does not seem to have a reliable reference. A lot of the article is about RNA Polymerase 2 instead of the C-terminus. The C-terminus was only brought up a few times. The sources are neutral, they just state scientific facts. How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Wikipedia talked about it in a similar way. We went more into detail as to why there is a terminus and how the peptide bonds form.