User:Xenopusgal17/Seadragon Genomes/Mallard23 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Xenopusgal17)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Kirsten,

I think you are doing fantastic! For the suggested changes, I would just look at breaking it up some more. Again, I would try to talk about that life history in a section by itself and then jump into the genomics with another section. That will just make it easier to kind of focus on that specific topic making it an easier read. Also, make sure that you're talking about the genomics in the genomics section. The anatomical stuff can go hand in hand with the genetics just always make sure to bring up the genetics. For example, what genetic components are leading to lost Fgf genes. Also, when explaining the ruby sea dragon genome, the anatomical stuff is solid just give me the genetics along with it.

Best regards,

Chason Duck